IN PURSUIT OF A DOUBLE STANDARD

By Lynn Stuter
May 12, 2009
Over the past year, numerous lawsuits have been filed regarding the eligibility of Also Known As (AKA) Obama to the office of president of the United States of America under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
While AKA claims to have been born in Hawaii, evidence shows that no one, outside a select group of people known to support his cause, has actually seen the document he claims is his birth certificate and that he claims he obtained from the Department of Health in Hawaii.
Regards the birth certificate:
1. The document he claims is his birth certificate is not a birth certificate, its a Certification of Live Birth; a birth certificate is issued at the time of birth; in this case 1961 before computers and computer generated documents.
2. The pictures of this document, that have turned up on the internet have been tampered with, meaning, quite bluntly, they have been forged/altered.
3. Any pictures that show up on the internet cannot be construed as legal proof of anything; to be legal proof that they are an exacting copy of the original requires a notarized document to that effect.
4. Requests of the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), under freedom of information, to produce the documents, signed by AKA, requesting what he is presenting as his birth certificate, have not been responded to, suggesting that,
a. The HDOH is deliberated obstructing the peoples right to know;
b. No such request was ever made by AKA and the documents AKA are presenting are, indeed, forged as has been stated by forensic specialists in sworn affidavits;
c. The HDOH is hoping that in dragging their feet, the request for disclosure will be abandoned.
In regards to number four above, the last request for disclosure was sent, via e-mail, receipts requested, on May 5, 2009 at 10:53 a.m. (7:53 p.m. Hawaii time); within three minutes of sending the e-mail to Janice Okubo at the HDOH, the following response was received:
Your message
To: Okubo, Janice S.
Subject: Request for Disclosure; attention required
Sent: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:53:39 -1000
was read on Tue, 5 May 2009 07:56:33 -1000
The requested documents have yet to arrive, nor any explanation of why they havent. The original request for disclosure was made two months, on March 14, 2009 by letter to the HDOH.
Of course, the birth certificate issue is only part of AKAs problem with regards to his usurpation of the Oval Office, his illegal occupation of the White House.
AKA has, himself, claimed that he was, at birth, a dual citizen, American by virtue of his mother; British by virtue of his father. This would only be possible if he was born in Hawaii and there is no proof that he was. If he was born in Kenya, as his step-grandmother has claimed before witnesses, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was not old enough to confer her American citizenship to her son, which means he was, at birth, a British subject. Beyond this, under the British Nationality Act of 1948 which extended to the British colony of Kenya, the child of a British subject, no matter where born, is a British subject. That means Obama was, at birth, a British subject no matter whether born in Hawaii or born in Kenya.
There is also the matter of his adoption by Lolo Soetoro following his marriage to Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) and the moving of the family to Jakarta, Indonesia where AKA was registered at the Fransiskus Asssisi Primary School as Barry Soetoro, his father listed as Lolo Seotoro, and his citizenship listed as Indonesian. By his own admission, in 1981, at the age of 20, Barry Soetoro traveled to Indonesia and Pakistan. He could not have traveled on an American passport to Pakistan at that time which means he traveled on a foreign passport (probably Indonesian, possibly British or Kenyan).
The Rest&NewsWithViews.com